Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Mandates: They Connect More Than They Seem

As I was thinking yesterday about some of the new mandates facing the trucking industry, I began to connect the dots. The purpose of the new EOBR mandate probably has little if anything to do with its said purpose: safety. Instead, this mandate's purpose is likely to force drivers of older trucks into newer models that comply with other fuel economy and emissions mandates.

Think of the drivers of these trucks.

 
 


In all likelihood, these drivers do not want a new truck, cannot afford one, or like the classic look and customizability of the older models. For whatever reason, these drivers choose to operate older, quality equipment that emits more emissions and gets lower fuel mileage.

Of course, this is their right. However, with the new EOBR mandate, these trucks would not be able to operate. Therefore, drivers of vehicles such as these would have no choice but to drive today's machines or be forced out of business.

Again, the choice is yours. Either you stand with truckers against EOBRs, or you can allow these mandates to force all drivers to operate futuristic, unattractive, shapeless rides. These machines may get 10 miles a gallon and have enough gadgets to be featured in a technology conference, but they also require a monthly payment and a monthly fill-up of DEF, items these older trucks do not need.

And when a new truck breaks, it cannot be fixed with simple wrenches, screwdrivers, and hammers. Instead, it must be towed to a dealer or service facility with the technology to fix the truck's gadgetry.

Although I am in favor of technological improvements wherever they can be made, in this economic situation, the last thing America needs is more mandates to drive truckers out of business. When the trucks stop, America stops too.

Do you want to drive these?


Thanks to Virgil Tatro for informing me about non-electronic trucks.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Shop for Chrome at Iowa80.com!